I like Greg LeMond… I know he means well… but it always seems like he goes about it the wrong way. Here’s a video of him at the Lance Armstrong press conference at Interbike.
He just comes across as kinda crazy. Frankly his argument is kinda weird to me too. He says that performance alone is an indicator of doping. Or… if you get faster you must be doping? The Drunk Cyclist thinks Greg has a valid point… so maybe I’m just dumb.
I think the DNA passport thingy-ma-bob sounds like a better idea.
Kinda Interesting?